Resources
Governance intelligence. In practice.
Perspectives, frameworks, and tools for boards and the executives who support them, on AI governance, director liability, and the oversight decisions that matter.
Resources
Perspectives, frameworks, and tools for boards and the executives who support them, on AI governance, director liability, and the oversight decisions that matter.
Featured
Boards sometimes hesitate to run a governance assessment for fear of creating a discoverable record. The policy environment developing around AI oversight suggests that reasoning deserves a second look.
Read the piece
Not technical questions, governance questions. The ones that reveal whether the deployment has a defensible oversight structure or a liability gap in waiting.
When a company overstates what its AI does, directors can find themselves personally exposed, especially if they approved communications they didn't scrutinize.
Regulators, insurers, and plaintiffs' attorneys are converging on a new standard. What "adequate AI oversight" means for directors is being defined right now.
Boards are rarely told what AI fairness testing was done before deployment. Most don't know to ask. Here's the question set that changes the conversation.
Fire drills exist because the first time shouldn't be the real thing. The same logic applies to AI governance decisions. Almost no board has run the drill.
When an AI system causes harm, three different insurance towers all claim the loss belongs to someone else. Understanding the gap is a governance responsibility.
The Compass assessment is where every Vela engagement begins. Request access or a briefing to discuss what it surfaces for your board.